Shinobi No Mono

This is the first in a series of films about ninjas.  This is not the kind of movie one might expect from a ninja tale.  This is a very historical, realistic portrayal of assassins.  The ninjas here are essentially sneaky samurai.

The story centers on a young ninja named Goemon.  He is charged with the task of assassinating the warlord Nobunaga.  But after an affair with his master's wife (and her accidental death), Goemon is shamed into becoming a thief for his master, Sandayo.  Goemon meets an equally shamed woman (a prostitute) and they fall in love, which leads Goemon to swear off being a ninja.  But Sandayo threatens Goemon's new found love and in order to save her, Goemon must complete his mission.  Cue ninja action!

This is a very basic tale.  It is more of a drama about shame and discovering your priorities than a balls out ninja action movie.  Just remember, there is nothing special about the ninja other than they are sneaky.  Not to say that the ninja don't kick ass in the movie, it's just that they are very human.

I love old jidai geki movies, but most are about samurai (because samurai kick more ass than ninjas).  It was nice to have a change of pace and see a different warrior with different techniques.  Very good movie.  I plan on finding the rest of the series. 

Ranking: 7 out of 10

The Crazies

To continue the chain from "Two Evil Eyes," I treated myself to George Romero's "The Crazies."  I saw the remake (which is surprisingly good), but this film blew it out of the water.

The story involves a biological weapon that accidentally infects a small town turning the inhabitants into deranged murderers.  Before too long, the movie splits into two stories: one follows the military leaders as they try to deal with the problem and the other follows a band of uninfected people as they try to escape the town.

The plot involving the military is the best.  For the most part, this felt like an installment in the "Dead" series.  It has a feel that evokes the end of "Night of the Living Dead" and the beginning of "Dawn of the Dead" (it actually was filmed between "Night" and "Dawn").  And whereas most movies that set a dark tone and then attempt to add humor fail miserably, "The Crazies" walks that fine line with incredible aplomb.  It's nice to chuckle every once and again, especially during a film so heavy with bureaucratic bickering and violence.

Awesome!  Awesome!  Awesome!  This is my favorite on my 5 movie Netflix streaming marathon (beating "The Church" by a narrow margin).  Check this one out!

Rating: 7.75 out of 10 (like I said, narrow margin)

The Church

The next movie in my Netflix streaming run ties in rather nicely with the last one.  This time, I watched "The Church" which was written and produced by Dario Argento.

The concept is pretty simple and satisfying.  Back in Ye Olde Tymes, a group of Teutonic Knights slaughter a village because they believe they are witches (they might actually be).  The Knights put the villagers in a mass grave and build a Gothic cathedral over it (they obviously didn't see "Poltergeist").  Then, we come to Modern Times.  Many people are in the cathedral for various reasons: a restoration crew (who fuck everything up), a bride and her friends (looking to get some awesome wedding photos despite not being wed there), tourists (demon fodder), and the various priests and church workers.  The restoration crew jackhammers through the floor into the mass grave and releases the evil.  These old churches apparently has only one door and the demons lock it.  People get possessed.  People die in awesome ways.  And the day must be saved by a 14 year old Asia Argento!

This was a way better movie than it probably ever deserved to be.  I really, REALLY enjoyed it.  The acting is on par with a late 80s Italian horror film but the execution is wonderful.  There is always something happening (a rarity among 80s genre movies) and it is always fun. 

There is a great creepy atmosphere to this movie, which is much added by a great score by Philip Glass.  Throw in a couple of Goblin tracks and you've got the makings of a must-see horror flick.

Anyone who likes horror should check this out.  Please, treat yourself to "The Church."

Rating:  7.5 out of 10

Two Evil Eyes

This is the 2nd of 5 reviews I'm writing for some Netflix streaming movies that were leaving my queue.  The announcement that they were leaving play instant status came at such a point that I only had two days to watch them all (there were 6 total but I couldn't get them all out of the way).

"Two Evil Eyes" marks the reunion of Dario Argento and George Romero.  This time the two eschew zombies in favor of contemporary retellings of Edgar Allen Poe tales.  The movie is split into two stories (or do I call them evil eyes?), the first directed by Romero and the second by Argento.  I'll tackle the stories individually, but rate the movie as a whole.  Let's begin.

Romero directs "The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar."  In it, a trophy wife (a bit past her prime, in my opinion) is attempting to liquidate her husband's assets before he dies of some illness.  Her husband's lawyer calls Mr. Valdemar despite his fragile condition.  Mr. Valdemar confirms from his deathbed that he is, indeed, signing over his fortune to his wife.  She is then warned that if anything should happen to Mr. Valdemar in the next three weeks (the time needed to finalize the transfer) she'll have the cops on her ass.

Turns out this gal is sleep with her husband's doctor.  And this doctor just happens to be a master of hypnotism.  Whenever Mr. Valdemar has signed documents or talked to his lawyer, it has been under hypnotic suggestion.  Whenever he is not giving away his fortune, he is kept in a hypnotic catatonic state.  Well, terminally ill people tend to die and inconvenience people and Mr. Valdemar is no exception.  Not wanting to deal with a police investigation, Mrs. Valdemar and the doctor hide Mr. Valdemar in a freezer in the basement.

Since Mr. Valdemar died while under hypnosis, he cannot pass on without being awoken from his hypnotic state.  His between death status makes him a conduit for evil spirits to pass into our world.  Mrs. Valdemar hears moaning from the corpse and is told what to do to avoid evil spirits in her house.  She tries to get the doctor to stop the hypnosis but guess what?  He hypnotizes himself in order to sleep at night and she can't wake him!

The next day, the corpse is still moaning so she shoots it in the face.  Good luck with the police investigation.  So she and the doctor concoct a plan to bury the body and run away with the money she has.  But the evil spirits come and the corpse rises from the freezer and shoots Mrs. Valdemar.  The doctor runs with the money.  The evil spirits follow him and murder him while he sleeps.

This was a pretty good story.  I did find the whole hypnosis thing kind of hard to accept.  I think it was due to the quantity of hypnosis.  Everything that happens is because of hypnosis.  If you can accept that, then this half of the movie is not so much scary, as just a fun time.  Romero is just a solid director.  The story progresses well and the main characters are shown to be awful enough that their comeuppance is truly satisfying (especially the doctor's.  Just watch it!)

Now Part 2:

Dario Argento directs "The Black Cat" which stars Harvey Keitel.  Keitel plays a crime scene photographer named Rod.  His girlfriend Annabel takes in a black cat.  Annabel is kind of a hippy, pagan chick and the cat is strangely violent toward Rod (who is very much an aggressive asshole).  This results in Rod strangling the cat and photographing it for a book he is releasing.  Annabel finds out what he did (that's what happens when you publish photos of you murdering your girlfriend's cat) and starts plotting leaving him.  Rod has a dream wherein he is executed, during Medieval times, for the death of the cat..

Rod goes to the bar and gets drunk.  The bartender shows him a cat that is identical to the one he killed.  He buys the cat and takes it home to kill it again.  Annabel intervenes and ends up on the wrong end of a meat cleaver.  Rod convinces the neighbors that everything is fine and hides Annabel in the walls.  But Rod can't keep his lies straight.  To make matters worse, the cat returns.  Rod saws it half and throws it away.  The police arrive to ask about Annabel's disappearance.  They are lead by a strange mewling to Annabel's wall grave which they open with a pickaxe.  But the police find that the cat has deposited a litter of kittens in the corpse and they are feeding on Annabel!  Distracted by this, they are unable to defend themselves when Rod grabs the pickaxe and dispatched the officers.  He tries to escape by climbing a rope from an upstairs and becomes entangled in the rope, thus hanging himself.

I preferred this part of the movie, mostly because Harvey Keitel owns his performance.  The story is ok and Annabel does not inspire sympathy (I probably would've killed her without the help of booze and stress).  That's really it.  Harvey Keitel.  All you need to know.

This was fun yet ultimately forgettable movie.  Good for background on Halloween or if you're in the mood for a better than average but mindless horror movie.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10

Venus In Furs

Wow.  What happens in this movie?  Things happen for sure.  I just don't see how they create a story or a mystery.

I do like this film, however (look at that poster for Christ's sake!)  It is a Jess Franco movie.  'Nuff said in my opinion.  His direction doesn't exactly guarantee a great film but it does ensure an interesting film.  In that sense, "Venus in Furs" does not disappoint.  A trumpet player finds a dead girl on a beach in Istanbul.  He recognizes her as a girl he saw stripped and tortured at a ritzy party (hosted by Klaus Kinsky!) the night before.  He decides to get out of Dodge and takes off for Rio De Janeiro.  Right about the time he starts to calm down from the events, Klaus Kinski and a girl who is identical to the dead girl (is it the same girl?) show up at the club in Rio.  The trumpet player and the woman fall in love.  Then the people who "killed" the woman (or did they?) start turning up dead.  So they return to Istanbul.  The girl turns out to be dead and he wanders out on the beach again only to find his own body and realize that he, too, is dead.

Story-wise, "Venus in Furs" is weak.  It stands out as an example of trashy 70s European atmosphere.  If you like surrealism or 70s exploitation, this is for you.  If you like mainstream movies or plots that make sense, stay away.  I LOVE these kind of movies.  I can't get enough of the kaleidoscopic cinematography, the sleaziness of the characters and settings, the strange violence, the nudity.  Franco movies are rife with these and "Venus in Furs" brings them together very well.  Some Franco movies are violent, some are sexual, some have interesting camerawork.  Few have it all and for that reason, "Venus in Furs" is considered by many to be his masterpiece.  Franco has directed too many movies (many of which I haven't seen) for me to chime in on that, but it is a strong entry in his oeuvre.

Last thing to mention, the excellent soundtrack by Manfred Mann (what, no Earth Band?).  Wonderfully jazzy and really works with a movie about a trumpet player (whose fingering never seems to sync up with the music).  Great stuff.  I realize that contemporary musicians lend their talents to soundtracks but it seems that collaborations like this are few and far between.

If you're a Franco fan and have somehow missed this movie, go check it out NOW.  If you'd like to give Franco movies a try, this is probably the most accessible of his films that I've seen.  While the appreciative audience for this movie may be slim, I would recommend it to almost anyone (and maybe upset some folks).

Rating: 7 out of 10

Winnie the Pooh

So my niece and nephew came up to from Oklahoma City to visit!  This always provides me with an excuse to go see a kid's movie without being creepy.  I usually try to go see my kid's movies on Wednesdays at the latest possible time.  But with a pair of kid's in tow, I can go to a summer matinee!

This is a new non-CG animated Pooh adventure.  And it is exceptionally short.  "Winnie the Pooh" is 69 minutes long.  It is preceded by a short film, "The Ballad of Nessie," which I would like to discuss first.

"The Ballad of Nessie" clocks in a 12 minutes.  It's a great little story about how Nessie came to be in Loch Ness.  She is essentially kicked out of her pond by an evil golf course developer.  We then follow her as she and her rubber duckie as they go in search of a new home.  "Nessie" is a beautifully animated film.  The drawings are very late 40s to early 50s style, while the backgrounds look like remnants of tartan.  The whole story is told as a poem read lovingly by Billy Connolly.  "Nessie" is a sweetheart of a movie and completely worth the price of admission alone.

"Nessie" Rating: 8 out of 10

Now for the feature.  "Winnie the Pooh" is fairly well done.  I'm going to do my best to not compare it to the original.  I will make this comparison though: the animation is wonderful.  Sometimes it even evokes that sketchy look that older Disney movies had.  The change in voices messed with me a bit, but might not bother younger kids (I understand that the original actors can't be expected to live and/or perform forever).  That said, I really enjoyed John Cleese as the narrator.  He has an wonderful ability to capture the childishness of the story and the fun of talking to the characters.

The soundtrack features She & Him performing both the theme song and some original songs.  The original songs are not the strongest in Disney history but, when Zooey Deschanel sings them, her angel voice elevates them.

The humor is a little too dated in a modern way.  I don't know how to quite explain it.  The characters' reactions are a bit sitcom-y and the physical comedy is not funny (like most contemporary physical comedy).  The rest of the movie is filled with great stuff that really feels like it belongs in a Pooh story.  This maybe makes the other elements I mentioned stand out more.  It just creates a slightly uneven tone to the film.

On the whole, I say to check this one out (if only for "The Ballad of Nessie").  If you have young kids, they will love this movie.  My nephew was cracking up almost the whole time.  He and the other children in the theater so thoroughly enjoyed it, that it has probably skewed my perception of this movie and I'm glad for it.  This movie absolutely owned its target audience while remaining more than watchable by adult standards.

"Pooh" Rating: 6.5 out of 10

Mega Python vs. Gatoroid

I will watch any Sci-Fi (or SyFy or whatever) channel original movie.  These are the modern B-movies.  Are they ever any good?  Hell no.  But that's what's so fun about them.

"Mega Python vs. Gatoroid" (herein to be called "MPvG") is about a eco-warrior played by Debbie Gibson who steals a bunch of normal pythons and releases them into the Everglades.  Would an environmentalist actually release a non-native animal into a sensitive habitat?  Nope.  But how else is this movie going to happen?  Anyway, the snakes start killing all the alligators and growing to ridiculous sizes.  So a Park Ranger played by Tiffany (that's right Debbie Gibson and Tiffany in the same movie!) issues hunting licenses to a pack of rednecks to kill the snakes and protect the gator population.  The snakes kill all the rednecks and the Ranger's fiance.  What's a woman to do?  How about feed the gators experimental steroids so they can fight the snakes?  Needless to say the snakes and gators soon reach Godzilla-esque size on the eve of the Everglades fund-raiser.  Pandemonium ensues, people die, and thousands of eggs are discovered (these reptiles are busy).  Can these giant menaces be destroyed before they reach Miami?  Rent it and find out!

"MPvG" is awesomely bad.  The effects are terrible.  The acting is terrible.  The Micky Dolenz cameo (seriously!) is terrible.  But it all results in a fun film.  I laughed pretty hard most of the time.  The rest of the time was spent trying to comprehend the idiotic plot and dialogue.  My favorite line?  Tiffany is giving a speech at the fund-raiser and ends it like this: "When I look out and see this beautiful, lush area, I think of my late fiance, Justin Regina.  And now ladies and gentlemen, keep drinking!"  That's awful.  Just awful.  Fortunately, this is followed by an incredible Gibson/Tiffany catfight. (You still haven't rented this yet?!)

I love this kind of garbage cinema.  It makes me smile.  I can only hope it can do the same for you.

Rating: 3 out of 10 (but 12 out of 10 on the fun scale)

To Be or Not To Be

Wow!  What a great film!  Seriously.  I love old movies anyway (this is the 1942 film, not the Mel Brooks remake), but this is a film that really lives up to its reputation as an important classic.

"To Be or Not To Be" is about a troupe of actors who get caught up in the Polish Resistance during the Nazi occupation.  They are called upon to use their talents to halt the activities of a Nazi double agent.  This could easily be a serious war-time drama.  Instead, director Ernest Lubitsch crafts an impeccable comedy.  I found myself laughing out loud at every Nazi joke and jab at the self-importance of actors.

Why are these old films so much better than new films?  It is because the actors were better?  Were the directors better?  Were the scripts better?  Yes.  Yes.  And Yes.  Check this movie out.  One of the great comedies of all time and one of the great World War II movies of all time.  That's pretty impressive.

Rating: 9 out of 10

Inglourious Basterds

This is not the first time I have seen this movie.  I've watched it probably a dozen times.  But if I haven't reviewed a movie and I watch it, I'll be adding it the the reviews.

This is not my favorite Tarantino movie (that's "Pulp Fiction") or the most watchable ("Jackie Brown") but it is, to me, his best made film.  My only fault with this movie is that it is too short (and at 2 1/2 hours that's saying something).  I want to see more of the Basterds and more of Hans Landa and more of everything.

"Inglorious Basterds" is revisionist history at its finest.  The story involves multiple plotlines that converge on a scheme to destroy the Nazi high command in at a movie premiere. 

The dialogue is phenomenal.  The acting perfect.  The soundtrack outstanding.  It is violent when it needs to be.  Talkative when it needs to be.  And always awesomely entertaining.

World War II movies should be outlawed from here on out.  Tarantino has crafted the WW2 movie to end WW2 movies.  If somehow, you haven't already seen this film, go do it.  Right now.

Rating: 9 out of 10

Green Lantern

It should be noted that I am a HUGE fan of the Green Lantern comics.  As such, I will do my best to review this movie as just that: a movie.

DC Comics has finally released a non-Batman film!  This may seem like great news, but Christopher Nolan's Batman series set the bar pretty high.  I was pretty back and forth as to my enthusiasm for this movie.  Warner Bros. released plenty of production teasers and promotional material to help psych up the fans, but most of it served to break my heart.  So when the time came to finally see this bad boy, I went in cautiously optimistic.  This seems to have been the appropriate mindset.

The movie is about a test pilot named Hal Jordan (played by Ryan Reynolds) who is irresponsible and brash.  Early in the film, an alien crashes on Earth and his ring, sensing its owner's death, seeks a new bearer.  It chooses Hal.  Hal then travels to the planet of Oa to begin his training as a member of the intergalatic Green Lantern Corps.  Hal receives plenty of harassment for being human (the first one to bear a Green Lantern ring) and returns to earth to save us all from a massive alien powered by fear.

The plot was fairly good.  If anything it suffered from trying to cram too much into its running time.  The filmmakers really should have picked whether to have a Earth movie or a space movie.  ("Thor" suffers from this problem too.)  With any luck, the sequel will be more evenly paced as the premise and characters are already set up.

The cast, however, I felt was fairly strong.  Ryan Reynolds (while not my first choice for this role) played Hal very well.  He has a natural charm that works help the audience like him regardless of what a reckless turd he is.  He delivers his jokes a little too much like he's still playing Van Wilder, but he also plays the drama like he's going for an Oscar.  He is a star presence to be reckoned with (anyone who can distract you from that god-awful CG outfit should be showered with praise).

Blake Lively is the strongest member of the cast, surprisingly enough.  She really pulled off Carol Ferris.  She's a strong business woman, a hopeless romantic, and a damsel in distress and she performs all these roles believably and seamlessly.  As a bonus, she looks much better as a brunette than blonde.

Peter Saarsgard plays the human villain, Hector Hammond. Saarsgard is one of my favorite actors.  He is weak and sleazy and looks to be having fun hamming it up under some really great makeup.

Mark Strong plays the great, albeit megalomaniac, Green Lantern Sinestro.  He doesn't receive the screen time that he this role truly deserves but he is great when he's on screen.  He'll be an amazing villain in the sequel.

Tim Robbins and Angela Bassett are wasted in this.

The art direction of Oa is fun.  It comes off like a hybrid of H. R. Giger and Dr. Suess.  This includes the designs of the aliens.  They seem kind of strange and hard to relate to.  Maybe later films can devote more time to characterization so as to help the audience connect with them.

My big problem with this movie is too much CGI.  So much of this movie could have been practical effects or a mix of practical and CGI.  Instead, the filmmakers must have just taken the easy way out.  Ever notice how the first movies with computer effects look better than current computer effects ("Jurassic Park" and "Dragonheart" come to mind).  Back then, computers were the hard way of doing things and that extra effort shows.  Now computers are the easy way and it equally shows.  At times the film comes off as false and cartoony (I started having flashbacks of the Star Wars prequels).

Despite these shortcomings, I really enjoyed it.  I have my comic fanboy grievances to be sure, but I would tell anyone to at least check this one out.  You'll be thankful you did if the sequel goes full on intergalactic and kicks our asses.

Rating: 7 out of 10

The Adjustment Bureau

How many Philip K. Dick stories are left to be mined my Hollywood?  I don't know but it can't be many.  "The Adjustment Bureau" (based on the story "The Adjustment Team") closes that gap (and then the remakes start).

This particular story revolves around a man running for the Senate in New York.  He meets a dancer (ballet not the other pay-by-the-dance type) and they fall in love.  But a shadowy organization of men in suits (and hats!) does not want them to be together.  Why?  Watch the movie.

Matt Damon plays the Senate candidate and he does an admirable job of being Matt Damon.  He's charming and handsome and anyone would vote for him.  But his performance is nothing special.

Emily Blunt is the dancer (unfortunately ballet and not the pay-by-the-dance type).  She plays the role exactly right.  As with any good love story, the audience needs to feel as if they could love the characters in order to connect to the romance.  Blunt is very lovable (except when she ruins Damon's cell phone. I would've punched her.)

"The Adjustment Bureau" is an enjoyable movie.  Nothing outstanding like "Blade Runner."  But nothing awful like "Imposter."  The first half is better than the second.  Somehow, I enjoyed the budding romance more than the mystery of the men-in-suits.  The mystery men of the Adjustment Bureau move magically through doors.  They open your closet door and step out in P.F. Chang's.  The second half is purely a showcase of magical doorway special effects.

This is a good movie for the couple who can't agree on a movie.  It's a little bit romance; a little bit sci-fi.  I wouldn't run out and watch this one.  But if the movie you want is rented out, try this one.

Rating: 6 out of 10

The Hangover: Part 2

Ok.  I think everybody loves "The Hangover."  How can you not?  It's one of the funniest movies made in the last 10 years.  Based solely on this, people showed up in droves to see the sequel.  And for this, they were rewarded with almost the exact same movie.  This is not to say that "The Hangover 2" is a bad movie, it's just that the first one is so much better.

In the sequel, Phil, Alan, and Stu throw a bachelor party in Bangkok.  That is primarily the only difference between this and the original.  Every plot point is a mirror image of the original.  Even most of the camera shots are the same.

Now this is not to say that "The Hangover 2" isn't funny.  It is.  It's much funnier than I expected.  As a retread of the original, of course it turned out to be funny.  I still laugh when I watch the original.  However, the jokes in Part 2 tend toward the perceived sleaziness of Bankok.  "The Hangover: Part 2" is never too shy as to utilize male nudity for a laugh (some really great laughs too).

But that sleaziness is part of the problem with this movie (apart from the constant reminders from the characters that "It's happening again!!").  The writers and director obviously felt as if they needed to outdo the original.  Not true!  Just try something else.  A funeral.  A high school reunion (that Alan crashes).  A road trip.  Anything!  Just don't make the same movie twice.

I can recommend this movie and sleep at night, but don't feel like you have to rush out and see it.  If you own the first one, put that one in. 

Rating: 6 out of 10 ( let's hope they try harder on "The Hangover: Part 3")

Croupier

"Croupier" is about a man who becomes a casino dealer in order to mine for material for his novel.  After encountering the seedy world of casinos, he agrees to participate in a scam that nets him a crap ton of money.  He totally gets away with it and publishes a novel based on his experiences.

I'm going to keep this one short and sweet.

1) I love Clive Owen.  He doesn't let me down in this.  He's as cool and icy as ever.

2) This is a good, but not great movie.  Fun while it lasts but ultimately forgettable.

3) Why couldn't they find more attractive women to seduce him?  Even if a film is going to have so-so women naked in it, can't they at least look nude?  Ugh.

That's really all there is to say about this one.  If you like voiceover heavy, saxophone-soundtracked, pseudo-noir, than check this out.

Rating: 6 out of 10

Ulzana's Raid

Holy cow!  I've been gone for over a year.  I know no one is reading this blog, but it still feels like I let someone down.  Here's the excuse: my laptop has been broken for 13 months.  I put off fixing my computer for 13 months.  That's some new level of lazy.

Anyway, let's begin.

The more I watch the films of Robert Aldrich, the more convinced I am that he is a bit of an unsung genius.  The man may not have been making classics for the ages ("Kiss Me Deadly" aside), but he did make films that are note perfect for the intended audience: men.

"Ulzana's Raid" is a man-tastic movie.  It centers around an Apache Indian name Ulzana who takes a war party across Arizona in a murderous rampage.  The Army entrusts the hunt to a scout named MacIntosh and a newly graduated lieutenant.  The film alternates between violent Indian attacks and MacIntosh's awesome, manly, Old West wisdom until culminating in the film bloody shootout.

"Ulzana's Raid" is a film about grey areas.  Does the Army have the right to go kill Ulzana?  Of course.  He's out there killing innocent homesteaders.  Does Ulzana have a good reason to kill white people?  Of course.  White men have done wrong by him.  This movie may strike a richer chord today in our world of terrorist threat.  The concept of an enemy that knows no bounds or respect for human life is extremely prescient.

Aldrich pulls no punches.  There is violence in this movie that still shocks nearly 40 years later.  I found myself yelling things like, "Oh shit!" and "Goddamn!!" and "Kill that motherfucker!!!" at my television.  The best recommendation I can give this movie is that I had a great time watching it.  What more can I ask from a movie than that?

The directing is solid.  Nothing fancy, just straightforward storytelling and clean, easy to follow action (modern Hollywood directors could learn a thing or two).  This may be Aldrich's greatest strength.  He is no frills.  This makes him more of an everyman's director than Fuller and Peckinpah.

Combine that simple, masculine direction with an actor like Burt Lancaster (one of my all-time favorite actors!) and "Ulzana's Raid" becomes a great film.  Burt Lancaster was a charming, intensely athletic actor in his youth, but somehow he became more interesting as he aged.  He gained a distinction and wisdom that few other silver screen stars have ever possessed.  His methodical plotting and philosophical musings probably would have been unconvincing coming from a lesser actor.  Thank God he got this role because Aldrich might just as likely have cast Lee Marvin (again) but as much as I love Marvin, this is the kind of role for the older, more sensitive Lancaster.

Please watch this movie.  It's a wonderful film that deserves far more recognition than it receives.  "Ulzana's Raid" is now among my top movies to watch with your dad.  He'd be proud to know that his cinephile son isn't just a Fellini-loving namby pamby.

Rating: 8 out of 10